Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
Firstly, the prediction interval approach is always going to be the slowest. If speed is really a concern the other approaches are going to work better (and in my experience usually catch anomalies better too). Have you tried It does not currently exist but I could probably modify the function to allow a manual, externally generated backcast to be input instead of running the model. If that is what you really need. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I think you want forecast['forecast'] to be replaced with df (observed not forecast values) here |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
HI All,
Is there a possibility to use already pretrained models with the anomaly_detector[prediction_interval] method? if yes, I cannot find the way to supply the params to the detector.
since I have 300+ ts I would not do the training twice.
thanks in advance.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions