question about @walletconnect/ethereum-provider license

[jldec]

Check existing issues

• I checked there isn't already an issue for the bug I encountered.

Describe the bug

I noticed that the license for the @walletconnect/ethereum-provider is non-commercial.

This provider is bundled as a dependency of @wagmi/connectors which is MIT licensed.

Would it make sense to distribute this provider as a separate package?

What Wagmi package(s) are you using?

wagmi, @wagmi/connectors

Wagmi Package(s) Version(s)

wagmi v2.18.1 (@wagmi/connectors v6.0.1)

[jldec]

Here's the PR from Aug 20 with the license change
WalletConnect/walletconnect-monorepo#6867

[jldec]

Activity regarding this provider in #4834

[jxom]

@reown/appkit at 1.7.8 contains an Apache license, not the updated license as mentioned above. We are working with them on revising the license for versions post-1.8.0.

[jldec]

Thanks for the clarification @jxom, that makes sense.

Here's the current dependency tree and github release links in case anyone else wants to check this.

x402 0.7.1
└─┬ wagmi 2.19.2
  └─┬ @wagmi/connectors 6.1.3
    └─┬ @walletconnect/ethereum-provider 2.21.1
      └── @reown/appkit 1.7.8

• @walletconnect/ethereum-provider v2.21.1 release
• @reown/appkit v1.7.8 release
  • commit tree with Apache license

[tmm]

Moving connector dependencies to optional peers so you will only need to install dependencies you need.

#4857