Merge pull request #66 from wbcsd/test-typo

[JohnDevitt]

No description provided.

[vercel]

@raimundo-henriques is attempting to deploy a commit to the wbcsd Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
pact-catalog	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Sep 19, 2023 10:42am

[raimundo-henriques]

@JohnDevitt,
I took the liberty of committing directly on your branch to fix what seemed to be a typo: Altruistiq's solution in the catalog has version 2.0.0, rather than 1.0.0.
Can you please confirm if you agree with this change?
Thank you,
Best,

cc. @prasadt1

[JohnDevitt]

@JohnDevitt, I took the liberty of committing directly on your branch to fix what seemed to be a typo: Altruistiq's solution in the catalog has version 2.0.0, rather than 1.0.0. Can you please confirm if you agree with this change? Thank you, Best,

cc. @prasadt1

We've implemented v2 at co2ai and we tested Altrusitiq for v2 also. Both of these should be v2 IMO.

[raimundo-henriques]

@JohnDevitt , do you mean the version of the technical specifications? That one is identified in the "pathfinder_version" field and it's indeed 2.0.1.

My change concerned the version of Altruistiq's solution. Each solution ("tested_solution" and "tested_by", that is) includes a "version" field that identifies the version of the solution. Altruistiq's solution in the catalog is identified as version 2.0.0 (as indicated in their solution name), but the value of the "version" field was 1.0.0, hence my change.

Thank you!

[JohnDevitt]

@JohnDevitt , do you mean the version of the technical specifications? That one is identified in the "pathfinder_version" field and it's indeed 2.0.1.

My change concerned the version of Altruistiq's solution. Each solution ("tested_solution" and "tested_by", that is) includes a "version" field that identifies the version of the solution. Altruistiq's solution in the catalog is identified as version 2.0.0 (as indicated in their solution name), but the value of the "version" field was 1.0.0, hence my change.

Thank you!

Apologies, right you are.

We're also v1, so I've added another commit to fix that. We're all good to go now I believe :)

[raimundo-henriques]

I'm glad we could clarify it! Thank you for your quick responses!
We will merge your PR right away