You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I’m not sure if this is the right contact point, but my question is whether or not there is an inverse relation for the OWL-Time time:hasTime object property? If not we would appreciate one, perhaps called time:timePertainsTo to enable easy addition of dates associated with an entity. The RDF building tool (http://robot.obolibrary.org/template) we use reads in tabular data and converts to RDF triples, so reverse relations are sometimes much more convenient. (In our project case, types of regulatory pesticide issue/revocation etc. dates that have a many-to-one relation to a pesticide.)
Regards,
Damion
Damion Dooley, Ontology Development Lead
Mobile 778-688-0049
Centre for Infectious Disease Genomics and One Health
Faculty of Health Sciences, SFU, Canada
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
These days I'm a little wary of creating inverse properties since then you have a synching challenge - if there are two ways to express the same assertion, then what if they are inconsistent? And in this case, since the cardinality of time:timePertainsTo relations are potentially large, then time:hasTime would generally be easier to manage.
Indeed, with an extra table I can do the former. This request was just about shortcut convenience, but not a dealbreaker. The table we're putting into a RDF knowledge graph with the robot transform tool is a list of event types (pesticide authorized date, revoked date etc) per pesticide. Robot only has 1 subject entity per table row and all relations have to emanate from that entity, so having time:timePertainsTo lets us add one more TimeEntity-centric piece of info. Basically, doing the same semantically as IAO "is about" does for information about some entity.
I’m not sure if this is the right contact point, but my question is whether or not there is an inverse relation for the OWL-Time time:hasTime object property? If not we would appreciate one, perhaps called time:timePertainsTo to enable easy addition of dates associated with an entity. The RDF building tool (http://robot.obolibrary.org/template) we use reads in tabular data and converts to RDF triples, so reverse relations are sometimes much more convenient. (In our project case, types of regulatory pesticide issue/revocation etc. dates that have a many-to-one relation to a pesticide.)
Regards,
Damion
Damion Dooley, Ontology Development Lead
Mobile 778-688-0049
Centre for Infectious Disease Genomics and One Health
Faculty of Health Sciences, SFU, Canada
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: