From 07ea79cd220d24e1f562feeb4acfcb4b6ab7c856 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: plehegar
- It is important for the health of the group and the quality of review
- to avoid too much work being scheduled concurrently. For
- this reason, the Chair(s) may choose to stagger the scheduling of
- kick-offs, active work, and review of work items, or even defer
- final Chair and member review of items into a queue, if they feel
- they cannot adequately supervise the requested work in
- parallel. The amount of effort and time needed to support work items
- varies; even for a given work item, support may require more from
- one Chair than another based on familiarity or expertise, so rather
- than set a fixed quota, it is expected that Chairs will be open and
- public about these constraints, and especially clear with Editors
- and champions in the process of rallying support for items entering
- that queue.
-
- If there is a substantial amount of work being queued, or if work is
- ramping up outside the expertise of the current Chair(s), they are
- invited to recruit additional Chairs and call elections for an
- additional co-Chair.
- Scope
+ -->
- Workflow for Active Items
-
W3C Process)
to follow the W3C Code of Conduct.
+ It is important for the health of the group and the quality of review + to avoid too much work being scheduled concurrently. For + this reason, the Chair(s) may choose to stagger the scheduling of + kick-offs, active work, and review of work items, or even defer + final Chair and member review of items into a queue, if they feel + they cannot adequately supervise the requested work in + parallel. The amount of effort and time needed to support work items + varies; even for a given work item, support may require more from + one Chair than another based on familiarity or expertise, so rather + than set a fixed quota, it is expected that Chairs will be open and + public about these constraints, and especially clear with Editors + and champions in the process of rallying support for items entering + that queue. +
++ If there is a substantial amount of work being queued, or if work is + ramping up outside the expertise of the current Chair(s), they are + invited to recruit additional Chairs and call elections for an + additional co-Chair. +
+If there is a substantial amount of work being queued, or if work is ramping up outside the expertise of the current Chair(s), they are - invited to recruit additional Chairs and call elections for an - additional co-Chair. + invited to help recruit additional Chairs.
The Chairs should periodically look through the non-Members who have contributed to the Working Group and consider whether each one should be invited to participate as an Invited Expert. If a non-Member contributor would like to participate in meetings, they are encouraged to apply to be an Invited Expert. Participants in the group are required (by the +
The Chairs should periodically look through the non-Members who have contributed to the Social Web Incubator Community Group and consider whether each one should be invited to participate as an Invited Expert. If a non-Member contributor would like to participate in meetings, they are encouraged to apply to be an Invited Expert. Participants in the group are required (by the W3C Process) to follow the W3C Code of Conduct.