You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If I am correct, the current version identifies the refer-person attribute:
based on the person grammateme
based on the morph. tag - whenever the person grammateme is not available but there is the relevant tag position)
As a consequence, it appears also for some verbs (e.g., for být in ln94210_111.umr, r. 41, or počítat-006, r. 109) .
The refer-person attribute is appropriate only for personal pronouns?
This would mean for:
nodes with sempos n.pron. def.pers.* OR n.pron.indef
probably also for newly created entities?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It seems gram/sempos is often incorrect, e.g. the form "tu" can be adv.pron.def even when the morphological lemma and tag are ten and PDFS4----------, respectively. The morphological annotation was wrong in PDT-C 1.0, but was later fixed, while the sempos was not updated.
Personal pronouns (UMR person) in coreferential relations inherit their person value from the antecedent (if I am right). This does not work in case of a dialogue of 2 persons - then, the person changes in each reply (1->2, 2->1).
If I am correct, the current version identifies the refer-person attribute:
As a consequence, it appears also for some verbs (e.g., for být in ln94210_111.umr, r. 41, or počítat-006, r. 109) .
The refer-person attribute is appropriate only for personal pronouns?
This would mean for:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: