New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

spec license? MIT? #2

Open

bumblefudge opened this issue Nov 2, 2022 · 1 comment

bumblefudge commented Nov 2, 2022

sorry to be "that guy" but I always like people to know what the intended license of the output will be when they join a WG 😄

bmann commented Nov 2, 2022

specs aren’t code so no, not MIT.

Everything spec wise is the community specification license https://github.com/ucan-wg/spec/blob/main/LICENSE

some large companies and DIF folks wanted things IPR cleared so this should be all good to use.

this is a pattern we need to follow in all our WGs

and CASA should also adopt this set of tools.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment