Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pam/integration-tests/native: Check that the user 'r' is accepted #554

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 25, 2024

Conversation

3v1n0
Copy link
Collaborator

@3v1n0 3v1n0 commented Sep 24, 2024

This is something that was already manually tested, but since 'r' is a special string in the native model, let's add an explicit check, ensuring that a such user can work properly.

And no, we won't support a 'r' secret, even though we could just wait for a broker refusal before using it as a "go back" command, but at the date there's not a real requirement for that to increase the model complexity.

@3v1n0 3v1n0 requested a review from a team as a code owner September 24, 2024 17:47
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 24, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Please upload report for BASE (main@41e4039). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #554   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   84.73%           
=======================================
  Files           ?       79           
  Lines           ?     6957           
  Branches        ?       75           
=======================================
  Hits            ?     5895           
  Misses          ?      742           
  Partials        ?      320           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

This is something that was manually tested, but since 'r' is a special
string in the native model, let's add an explicit check, ensuring that
a such user can work properly.

And no, we won't support a 'r' secret, even though we could just wait
for a broker refusal before using it as a "go back" command.
@3v1n0 3v1n0 merged commit 908d67e into ubuntu:main Sep 25, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants