New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Support additional encodings (or even hashes?) for indicator matching #14

Open

baltpeter opened this issue May 25, 2023 · 1 comment

Labels

enhancement good first issue help wanted

Member

baltpeter commented May 25, 2023 •

edited

Loading

In #6, I'm implementing basic indicator matching with support for plain text, base64, and URL encoded text.

But with the framework we have, there's really no reason not to go beyond that. A few ideas for additional encodings we could support:

hex
HTML entities
Unicode escaping
quoted printable
punycode

In addition, we could even compute common hashes of the indicators and check for those.

baltpeter added the enhancement label

Member Author

baltpeter commented May 25, 2023

For the hashes, in line with the existing hashedIdfa property, we should probably prepend hashed to the property name the user set.

baltpeter added good first issue help wanted labels

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment