You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Adding gazelle_haskell_modules as a different target and running them in order works out fine.
Is this workflow of using a single target for both ("@io_tweag_gazelle_cabal//gazelle_cabal" and "@io_tweag_gazelle_haskell_modules//gazelle_haskell_modules" added to languages for the same target) simply not supported? If so, perhaps we should extend the README to indicate this. Additionally, it might be nice to add some better error instead of showing the internal golang exception. I guess this could be an issue for gazelle_cabal instead though.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Since gazelle_cabal generates rules that gazelle_haskell_modules needs to analyse, they are not straight-forward to run in a single gazelle invocation. I think it is good idea to say something about it in the readme.
While trying to smash
gazelle_cabal
andgazelle_haskell_modules
together in a single gazelle invocation, I get the following golang exception:Adding
gazelle_haskell_modules
as a different target and running them in order works out fine.Is this workflow of using a single target for both (
"@io_tweag_gazelle_cabal//gazelle_cabal"
and"@io_tweag_gazelle_haskell_modules//gazelle_haskell_modules"
added tolanguages
for the same target) simply not supported? If so, perhaps we should extend theREADME
to indicate this. Additionally, it might be nice to add some better error instead of showing the internal golang exception. I guess this could be an issue forgazelle_cabal
instead though.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: