You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The default color for any street without any bike facilities is red, and the assumption is that it lacks safe space for people using cycles.
At certain speeds and traffic volumes, however, such as a 20mph street with very low AADT, does it still make sense to illustrate it with red? This might factor into the LTS use case, which is somewhat different than what this map is trying to illustrate (strictly the presence of constructed bike facilities).
Some cities have 20mph maxspeed limits city-wide. Do the metrics fairly represent the cycling infrastructure of these low-speed areas?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The default color for any street without any bike facilities is red, and the assumption is that it lacks safe space for people using cycles.
At certain speeds and traffic volumes, however, such as a 20mph street with very low AADT, does it still make sense to illustrate it with red? This might factor into the LTS use case, which is somewhat different than what this map is trying to illustrate (strictly the presence of constructed bike facilities).
Some cities have 20mph maxspeed limits city-wide. Do the metrics fairly represent the cycling infrastructure of these low-speed areas?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: