Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

See if it's worth introducing lazy_static #14

Closed
tomusdrw opened this issue Mar 4, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

See if it's worth introducing lazy_static #14

tomusdrw opened this issue Mar 4, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@tomusdrw
Copy link
Owner

tomusdrw commented Mar 4, 2019

Check if creating Secp256k1 is heavy enough to be worth introducing lazy_static. Provide some benchmarks.
@tomusdrw tomusdrw mentioned this issue Apr 16, 2020
Open
@tomusdrw
Copy link
Owner Author

Seem it is slow as shown in #37. We should still introduce benchmarks and one of the proposed solutions in that thread. Closing in favor of the more specific issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@tomusdrw