-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 106
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
documentation of survcheck()
#277
Comments
survcheck is intended for mulit-state survival. |
Currently, it does not appears in the title, nor in the Description, only in Details. However, if I understand correctly, some check are useful for "standard" survival dataset too. I understand that this is low priority. I opened the issue just to let you know. Feel free to close without further comment. Thanks! |
I do appreciate the comment. I work hard at making good documentation, but as someone who has worked in the package for a very long time there are blind spots where something is "obvious" to me but not the user. Input like yours is the best way for me to find out. But I do have too many projects to get to this right away. |
Your hard work has already paid off; I think that |
I have trouble understanding how to use
survcheck()
. I do not think there is any issue in the code but maybe the documentation could be improved (in particular regarding the formula).I have a survival data set that contains data for 3 cohorts of patients. A patient can be included in several cohorts. In the end in build a survival model for each cohort. First, I start the analysis by a crude comparison of the cohorts:
I wanted to check the data. My first try was to reuse the same formula as above, but the RHS of the formula seems to be ignored (see the "Overlap check"):
Finally I found that the following calls returned identical outputs (beside the
call
component):It seems that I need to split the data before runing
survcheck()
:Some data to reproduce examples:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: