"task-spooler" package points to a fork

[viric]

Hello,

I'm the copyright owner task-spooler. I see that @twaik once updated it to a fork:
8dd857f

The person of that fork decided to publish his own new versions of task-spooler with the same name, instead of rebranding the derived GPL work. I asked that person to stop publishing task-spooler as if it were his own: justanhduc/task-spooler#56

If you use the name 'task-spooler' for the package, please point to the main source (as it was previous to @twaik commit) instead of that fork. If you prefer that fork, please pick a different name.

[sylirre]

@viric Would it be acceptable to change package name to task-spooler-ng?

Reverted to original and updated to v1.0.3. Hopefully this issue now resolved at Termux side.

[viric]

I don't like that the person said task spooler was not maintained. It's something he decided and then took over. As "-ng" sounds to me pretending to take over as well. He mainly added some gpu-related things; maybe task-spooler-gpu? No idea. I hope he answered with a new brand name, but maybe he abandoned his fork.

[sylirre]

I haven't really looked into the difference between original and the fork. If main feature of "v2.0" is presence of gpu support (disabled during build time), we can just stick to the original task-spooler.

[sylirre]

Reverted to the original: 2ad9edd

[viric]

He started publishing versions of ts even before 2.0. No idea. I only recently noticed. I think the whole point of the fork was the 'gpu' thing, since the beginning. Not only 2.0.

[viric]

fwiw I just released a bugfix version, 1.0.3.
https://viric.name/soft/ts/