Hi, Some links have failed and some figures miss.

[iScottMark]

In your technical write-up, there are some links (e.g. cross-validation set) and some figures (e.g. Fig.4) miss or fail. Please check again and improve them. Thank you!

[teaghan]

Thanks @iScottMark, the technical write-up is a bit out-dated at this point, but I will update this ASAP.

[iScottMark]

Thank you for your great works! At present, I'm studying the details of your paper. I have learnt some original ideas and some training tricks aimed to spectra instead of images or texts in the field of TRADITIONAL DL. However, as for GAN, I wonder in the future, whether you take the transformations of GAN(like WGAN, DCGAN) into account.

[teaghan]

Hi @iScottMark sorry for the delay; we have been working on finalizing the edits for submission. I haven't gotten around to editing the technical write-up, but perhaps the current version of our paper will serve as a useful guide. Please let me know if you have any questions. As for applying new GAN techniques, this is definitely of interest to this project, but we haven't had the time to try them.

[iScottMark]

@teaghan Hi! I have found some differences between 2 versions. (Formula, Imgs,...) But, I wonder when a calibrated line list by Cargile et al. (in prep.) mentioned in your paper & Ting's can be provided?

[teaghan]

Hi @iScottMark
Unfortunately, the paper is still under construction. I am not sure when it will be available as I am not associated with the project. Hopefully we can see it soon though!