Replies: 2 comments 4 replies
-
I've been thinking about this too. splinepy outgrew the original scope and is introducing some complexities. I generally agree with the idea, but I'd be even willing to go a step further. For example, here are two options:
Second option will probably be a bit easier, since we can just use all the helpers from |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
4 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I think at this point it would make sense to move some of the functionality of splines to
splinepy
, to makesplinepy
a more flexible library on its own.I would suggest moving the following functions to
splinepy
:We could also think about moving
create
tosplinepy
.ImO, it is not very consistent, where functions are placed, and it just grew that way historically, but
splinepy
would be more autonomous if we were to move these functions.@j042 I would love to hear your opinion on this
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions