Skip to content

Conversation

@tomchon
Copy link
Contributor

@tomchon tomchon commented Oct 31, 2025

No description provided.

@tomchon tomchon requested a review from feici02 as a code owner October 31, 2025 13:03
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @tomchon, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a critical dependency issue in the Docker build process by restoring the openjdk-17-jre-headless package to the base Dockerfile. This change is essential for ensuring that Java 17-based applications can execute correctly within the containerized environment, rectifying a previous omission or accidental removal.

Highlights

  • Dockerfile Dependency: The openjdk-17-jre-headless package has been re-added to the Dockerfile.base. This ensures that the necessary Java Runtime Environment is available for applications within the Docker container.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly re-adds the openjdk-17-jre-headless package to the base Docker image, which is a necessary dependency. I have one suggestion to improve the maintainability of the Dockerfile by sorting the package list alphabetically.

Comment on lines 9 to 15
locales \
net-tools \
netcat-openbsd \
openjdk-17-jre-headless \
tini \
tzdata \
valgrind \
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

For better readability and long-term maintainability, it's a good practice to keep package lists sorted alphabetically. This makes it easier to check for existing packages and add new ones. I've noticed the list in this section is not fully sorted. Could you please reorder the packages alphabetically?

            locales \
            netcat-openbsd \
            net-tools \
            openjdk-17-jre-headless \
            tini \
            tzdata \
            valgrind \

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants