The blue and red graph should be the same, but they differ with 0-10% depending on day.
Elimination of possible error sources
Suspicions
The difference between G—/Systemapic calcs is the least when there's most snow (ref. 20th Jan).
- If the mask was faulty (say, wrong SRID), then this would have the least effect when there's a lot of snow (with coverage going all the say to the coast, for example, and lots of area being 100%).
- So this perhaps indicates that there's something wrong - not with the calculation - but with the mask (or the watermask, perhaps).
The blue and red graph should be the same, but they differ with 0-10% depending on day.
Elimination of possible error sources
SRIDof raster. The raster is in correctSRID. Vector mask is transformed correctly from4326to3857, and vector- and raster mask yield same result. Also, all rasters aregdal_transformedtoSRID 3857on import.pixel valuesof raster. Since vector- and raster mask yield same results, there's likely nothing wrong with the raster mask per se.pixel scaleof raster. The scale differ between the mask and the snow-rasters.SCF_0.tif, SCF_160.tif, SCF_200.tifyield correct graph calculations of respectively0%, 60%, 100%, which means there's nothing wrong with the calc method.100-200are included, which has been thrice confirmed by Eirik.floatnumbers. Still same results.Darkest red line is with
0values of mask excluded.Suspicions
The difference between G—/Systemapic calcs is the least when there's most snow (ref. 20th Jan).