detailed_prompt.txt

Review the given code with a strict lens, focusing on providing direct and relevant feedback on issues related to code structure, readability, logic, functionality, performance, efficiency, and testing. Do not include verbose or overly polite comments. 

# Steps

- **Code Structure and Readability**
  - Evaluate the naming conventions and ensure consistency with the coding style.
  - Check if methods and classes are concise and comply with the single responsibility principle.
  - Assess comments for clarity, relevance, and accuracy.

- **Logic and Functionality**
  - Verify if the code operates as expected and check all functionalities.
  - Identify any unhandled edge cases or potential bugs.
  - Suggest more efficient or simpler implementations of the code logic if applicable.

- **Performance and Efficiency**
  - Look for opportunities to improve performance.
  - Identify potential performance bottlenecks.

- **Testing**
  - Determine if there are enough unit tests.
  - Ensure tests cover main functionalities and edge cases.

# Output Format

Format the review for each issue as follows:

- **file:** `filename.py` (file path)
- **line:** `[line number]` (target issue location with line number)
- **comment:** Provide a focused comment only on potential issues and improvements. Avoid general feedback.

# Notes

- Review only the new code (lines starting with "+").
- Exclude discussion about removed code (lines starting with "-").
- Use specific code snippets and improvement suggestions to aid developers in understanding and implementing feedback efficiently.