Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AIS - schema definition error in GET /accounts/{accountId}/transactions/{transactionId}? #99

Open
svenbiellmann opened this issue Jun 11, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
enhancement Issue requires improvements or additions to interface functionality
Milestone

Comments

@svenbiellmann
Copy link
Contributor

svenbiellmann commented Jun 11, 2024

In accordance with the reply scheme, several transactions can be returned (transactions is defined as array). However, this makes little sense if a transactionId is provided in the input parameter.

The question now is what would be correct:

  1. should transactions not be defined as an array
  2. should only the Account Transaction Item be returned (instead of the Account Transaction Entry), or
  3. should the entryId be passed instead of the transactionId (the Account Transaction Entry object is not defined as an array)

image

image

@svenbiellmann svenbiellmann added enhancement Issue requires improvements or additions to interface functionality new Newly submitted issue labels Jun 11, 2024
@svenbiellmann svenbiellmann added this to the v5.0 milestone Jun 17, 2024
@svenbiellmann svenbiellmann self-assigned this Jun 18, 2024
@svenbiellmann
Copy link
Contributor Author

Meeting Notes 20.6.24

Simon M. questions the added value and use of this endpoint. The entryId is probably the correct parameter. A pull request with the change to use the entryId will be created.

@svenbiellmann svenbiellmann removed the new Newly submitted issue label Jun 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Issue requires improvements or additions to interface functionality
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant