Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding new terms to the book #1

Open
ghost opened this issue Aug 25, 2013 · 2 comments
Open

Adding new terms to the book #1

ghost opened this issue Aug 25, 2013 · 2 comments

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Aug 25, 2013

I have created an experimental branch of the book, to add new terms and their definitions.

So far, I have added Neoism. I plan to add Yangism and Mohism next. What do you think so far?

How do you choose which terms belong in the book?

@stpeter
Copy link
Owner

stpeter commented Aug 29, 2013

What is Neoism? I haven't heard of Yangism, either. Mohism is a possibility.

I'm working right now to prepare a printed / ebook version of The Ism Book. While doing so, I'm planning to remove some terms (e.g., acosmism). Just as with an open-source project, I'm trying to avoid feature-bloat and even simplify the code a bit. :-)

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Aug 29, 2013

Neoism is a bit strange, to be honest. It's a philosophy that tries to defy classification — basically, it values this defiance for its own sake. It encourages culture jamming and collective identities. I find an interesting parallel between Anonymous and the Neoist philosophy; everyone branching forward and doing random things, all under collective names; people consider themselves as actually being Anonymous as a whole, and it gives them a sense of power.

Yangism was an ethically hedonistic philosophy, comparable to Epicureanism. It was opposed to Mohism and Confucianism, but it faded into obscurity after Confucianism became dominant.


Ah, if you're working on a printed version, perhaps you could use ConTeXt to automate the XML term processing.

Would this printed version appear formatted as any standard printed dictionary?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant