diff --git a/v8.18.3/guides/amp.md b/v8.18.3/guides/amp.md
index 19c8475..04672a2 100644
--- a/v8.18.3/guides/amp.md
+++ b/v8.18.3/guides/amp.md
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ ctx.renderPage = async () => {
 
 ## Two-way data binding
 
-AMP and React have fundamentally different patterns for managing state. React allows you to respond to events with javascript and update state using the update function returned by the `useState` hook. AMP uses a more declarative approach with [amp-bind](https://amp.dev/documentation/components/amp-bind/) that resembles to-way data-binding. In order to create a common approach to state management that works in both react and amp, `react-storefront-amp` provides two-way databinding via a `DataBindingProvider` component and the `bind` prop.
+AMP and React have fundamentally different patterns for managing state. React allows you to respond to events with javascript and update state using the update function returned by the `useState` hook. AMP uses a more declarative approach with [amp-bind](https://amp.dev/documentation/components/amp-bind/) that resembles two-way data-binding. In order to create a common approach to state management that works in both react and amp, `react-storefront-amp` provides two-way databinding via a `DataBindingProvider` component and the `bind` prop.
 
 Here's a simple example from `pages/p/[productId].js` that shows how the quantity selector updates the page state in both AMP and React using the same code:
 
diff --git a/v8.18.3/guides/performance.md b/v8.18.3/guides/performance.md
index 21a9ec1..ca2f2e9 100644
--- a/v8.18.3/guides/performance.md
+++ b/v8.18.3/guides/performance.md
@@ -37,5 +37,5 @@ mainProductImage.src = await getBase64ForImage(mainProductImage.src)
 
 ### defer vs async
 
-Oue tests show that using `defer` instead of `async` when importing client-side JavaScript generally improves Lighthouse performance scores by a few points. It usually improves FCP and LCP, but makes TTI and TBT a bit worse.  Normally this trade-off nets a higher Lighthouse score. This may or may not be the case for your app. You can experiment by changing the `mode` prop from `defer` to `async` in `NextScript` in `pages/_document_.js`
+Our tests show that using `defer` instead of `async` when importing client-side JavaScript generally improves Lighthouse performance scores by a few points. It usually improves FCP and LCP, but makes TTI and TBT a bit worse.  Normally this trade-off nets a higher Lighthouse score. This may or may not be the case for your app. You can experiment by changing the `mode` prop from `defer` to `async` in `NextScript` in `pages/_document_.js`