-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bret's info on ijidokun (kun homophones) #3
Comments
So, are you expecting me to do this or it's something that you will take charge? I don't get it, sorry. |
This is an interesting idea. Thank you for your suggestion. I already know of a couple other good sources of ijidōkun information: Kanjipedia has a large index, and the 8th edition of Sanseidō's 国語辞典 ("sankoku" for short) also contains links between ijidōkun entries. You may be surprised to find that JMdict already contains a lot of this information for forms that are near-synonyms. The information is usually contained within usage notes, which are prefixed with a notepad icon (📝) in Jitendex. For example, see the entries for Sometimes the information is also presented in the form of a cross reference. For example, the entry for However, for some ijidōkun words like So I'm thinking that for the majority of ijidōkun, the presentation of their similarities and differences needs to be reviewed and cleaned up upstream in JMdict rather than tacked-on by Jitendex. I could definitely put together a list of ijidōkun using the aforementioned resources (Bret's info, kanjipedia, and sankoku) and present it to the JMdict editors for their consideration.
No, you don't need to do anything. I'll keep this issue open and let you know when we make progress. |
Oh I see, thank you for your kind work and let's to our best in master this beautiful language! |
Hello Stephen I'm really busy with life and stuff, if you want to open the sheet to the world it's okay for me, when I get more free I take it better, happy new year and thank you for your compreension. |
No worries. There are always plenty of things to improve with this project. People can work on different things when they have time and interest. I have the editing restrictions on the sheet just to prevent vandalism. Have a happy new year. |
I wonder if it's possible to include this on the forms section (if Bret is okay with it, naturally), specially since it's on the web for free, I found the JMdict's original data really lacking on this aspect.
Just a suggestion.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: