-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 507
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Local MSA results different from MSA server #665
Comments
Related: #263 |
When I tried a short sequence input like
the server MSA and local MSA are the same. But with a longer input:
The server and local outputs differ. |
Can you post the terminal output of the |
@milot-mirdita Thank you for the response. The following is the stdout I got. I just tried |
Expected Behavior
I expect using
colabfold_search
with locally prepared DBs to give the same MSA results as those usingcolabfold_batch
with the MSA server.Current Behavior
The two give different MSA results given the same input
.fasta
.Steps to Reproduce (for bugs)
Install
colabfold==1.5.5
viapip
to a fresh newmamba
environment (python==3.11.10
).Build
mmseqs2
of commit71dd32ec43e3ac4dabf111bbc4b124f1c66a85f1
following ColabFold README.Execute the following to set up the DBs:
MMSEQS_NO_INDEX=1 bash setup_databases.sh $colabfold_db_dir
where I use the
mmseqs2
built from step 2 for thetsv2exprofiledb
commands.Prepare a sample
.fasta
file (saysample.fasta
) of a single protein sequence.Get a locally generated MSA by:
Independently, get a MSA generated by querying the server like:
Compare the
.a3m
files generated from steps 5 and 6.ColabFold Output (for bugs)
Omitted; I can attach outputs if necessary.
Context
I want to reproduce results from ColabFold notebooks on my local machine.
Your Environment
where I used the ColabFold code only for executing
setup_databases.sh
. Forcolabfold_{search,batch}
commands, I usedv1.5.5
installed viapip
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: