Feedback Lab 1

[ana-oprescu]

Exercise 1	Comments	Exercise 2	Comments	Exercise 3	Comments	Exercise 4	Comments	Exercise 5	Comments	Exercise 6	Comments	Exercise 7	Comments	Exercise 8	Comments	Bonus Exercise 9	Comments	Bonus Exercise 10	Comments	Total

6	Not quickCheck test implemented, no timing, no discussion about why the solution was selected	6	no timing, no quickcheck test provided, no discussion, answer not entirely correct, you are not testing mathematical fact	7	no timing, no quickcheck test provided, no discussion	6	no timing, no discussion neither testing provided	6	no timing, no discussion neither testing provided	10	Perfect	5	missing required tests for isCardType	9	-> issues	7	ok	5	nice implementation for Euler 10; unconvincing Euler 49; lots of compilation problems, due to implicit imports	7.475

[visknut]

I have two comments on recurring points of feedback for most of the exercises.

• We wrote the required time for each exercise in the individual files, since it took us all a different amount of time to do each exercise. We didn’t know only the group files were relevant. Starting with lab 3, we’ll make sure that this data can also be found in the group files.
• We designed the test functions so that they can all be tested with ‘quickCheck functionName’, instead of using quickCheck in our functions. Nowhere in the assignment is specified that a “quickCheck test” is a test using quickCheck, instead of a test designed for quickCheck. We choose the latter approach, because there are a lot arguments for quickCheck that you might want change/play around with while testing.