Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support 91-1 EDIFACT #321

Open
lawrence-tierney-daiwasports opened this issue Jul 3, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Support 91-1 EDIFACT #321

lawrence-tierney-daiwasports opened this issue Jul 3, 2024 · 4 comments
Labels
type: feature request New feature or request

Comments

@lawrence-tierney-daiwasports

Hi there,

It would be nice if Smooks had bindings and mappings for EDIFACT 91-1.

Reason: my organisation has a "black box" EDIFACT system for Invoices, Orders and Dispatch Advice, we produce and consume v91-1 messages. We are updating our DB and the system requires to be re-written from the ground up but it needs to support 91-1.

After having looked at the below realise this is unlikely.

#45
https://groups.google.com/g/smooks-user/c/sYrgs_FtHZs

Thanks in advance and keep up the good work!

@cjmamo cjmamo self-assigned this Jul 4, 2024
@cjmamo cjmamo added the type: feature request New feature or request label Jul 4, 2024
@cjmamo
Copy link
Member

cjmamo commented Jul 4, 2024

I'd say it's not high in the priority list. If your organisation is open to funding its development then I'm sure that we can prioritise it.

@lawrence-tierney-daiwasports
Copy link
Author

Yeah I figured as much; it is pretty ancient. TBH I can't see us funding the development (not that I personally would be adverse). Thanks for the response anyway.

@cjmamo cjmamo removed their assignment Jul 4, 2024
@cjmamo
Copy link
Member

cjmamo commented Jul 4, 2024

You might want to consider using the EDI cartridge with a rudimentary DFDL schema that captures all segments and data elements. But if you need validation to happen in Smooks then it's a different story.

@lawrence-tierney-daiwasports
Copy link
Author

Good idea. I'll look into it. Cheers mate

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: feature request New feature or request
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants