-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
tag symlinks #1
Comments
Yeah but I think it would be better if it would use docker-style tagging like example:0.0.1. I think most users would intuitively use it like that. |
Good input. I updated the issue |
I actually meant |
Im actually not a big fan of including the tags in the image name. Seems like a workaround for not really supporting tags to me. But I guess we should do it to stay as close as possible to the docker interface. Personally i would prefer following interface |
Maybe we could support docker tags on the first argument, but just for identifying the image on the docker host.
|
Hmm, actually lets forget about tags. They are exported anyway with the tarball. Its probably better to just keep it simple so we can manage it with bash scripts. |
So |
would be nice if
regisshtry-push example 0.1.0
created a symlinkexample:0.1.0 -> example.5
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: