You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Originally posted by WillHartley March 24, 2022
In the k-correct templates we have the mass in stars formed, and the mass remaining (after mass loss due to stellar winds, SNe etc.).
We're preparing a PR to allow use of stellar mass remaining. Current behaviour is that the function, stellar_mass(), refers to stellar mass formed. IMO, the default should be to return the remaining stellar mass.
Proposal:
We have two functions,
stellar_mass_formed()
stellar_mass_remain()
Then the function,
stellar_mass()
simply calls stellar_mass_remain()
Following the discussion, we cannot change the meaning of stellar_mass(), and so we will need to simply add a stellar_mass_remain() function.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Discussed in #536
Originally posted by WillHartley March 24, 2022
In the k-correct templates we have the mass in stars formed, and the mass remaining (after mass loss due to stellar winds, SNe etc.).
We're preparing a PR to allow use of stellar mass remaining. Current behaviour is that the function, stellar_mass(), refers to stellar mass formed. IMO, the default should be to return the remaining stellar mass.
Proposal:
We have two functions,
stellar_mass_formed()
stellar_mass_remain()
Then the function,
stellar_mass()
simply calls stellar_mass_remain()
Following the discussion, we cannot change the meaning of stellar_mass(), and so we will need to simply add a stellar_mass_remain() function.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: