You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As discussed in the Skupper Team g chat, I am observing repeated delivery of vanflow messages. This was uncovered by an unrelated skupper collector bug. Thanks for following along @ted-ross! I suspect this issue is in the router, but I didn't know where to start trying to reproduce it without the control plane.
To reproduce:
Set up Skupper version 1.5.1 running in three namespaces a, b and c and link all three.
skupper token create --namespace a --uses 2 token-a.yaml
skupper link create --namespace b token-a.yaml
skupper token create --namespace b token-b.yaml
skupper link create --namespace c token-a.yaml
skupper link create --namespace c token-b.yaml
Deploy this rough draft vanflow logging utility to each namespace to tail the logs. source.
Tail the logs of the vanflow logging utilities as you interact with the cluster. Messages originating in the A namespace are logged once from the A namespace but twice from the B and C namespaces.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
* [Fixes phantom process records observed in the console UI skupper#1341](https://github.com/skupperproject/skupper/pull/1341)
They are related @jiridanek - but I'd hesitate to call either a workaround. The flow collector should be idempotent (fix in skupper/pull/1341), and from what I understand vanflow messages should be delivered only once to each consumer with some reliability regardless of van topology (the topic brought up in this issue.)
Hi, I'm interested in investigating this ticket. If there's any concern / issue with me investigating this ticket, please do not hesitate to let me know. Thanks, Karen
As discussed in the Skupper Team g chat, I am observing repeated delivery of vanflow messages. This was uncovered by an unrelated skupper collector bug. Thanks for following along @ted-ross! I suspect this issue is in the router, but I didn't know where to start trying to reproduce it without the control plane.
To reproduce:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: