You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
IPv4 Host slider values wrong when BMR IPv4 pfx len exceeds 24 and network address is greater than 0.
Also possibly when IPv4 pfx len < 24 and host value exceeds 255.
Example:
IPv4 Pfx Length First IPv4 host
98.161.92.0 /28 0
98.161.92.16. /28. 16 --------- in this case, IPv4 Host slider shows "0" and moving to "1" increments "CE IP" to 17.
Initial slider value logic needs to account for smaller IPv4 CIDRs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The slider doesn't inherit the full last octet of the address when the mask is > 24.
This is because the host is still the 0th host of the current block.
Also, the slider can't inherit a host that is greater than 8 bits and display it in dotted notation. It would have to display the host in decimal format, which wouldn't make sense to a user.
The slider may need to be abandoned for "plus" and "minus" buttons like the "Source Port Index" has. That way they will be able to increment and decrement through the entire range of hosts without having to also display the host address.
sfreemire
changed the title
IPv4 Host slider values wrong when IPv4 pfx len > 24 and net addr > 0
Possible v4 host slider value display wrong, depending on v4 prefix length
Jun 12, 2024
sfreemire
changed the title
Possible v4 host slider value display wrong, depending on v4 prefix length
IPv4 host slider value display can be wrong, depending on v4 prefix length
Aug 2, 2024
IPv4 Host slider values wrong when BMR IPv4 pfx len exceeds 24 and network address is greater than 0.
Also possibly when IPv4 pfx len < 24 and host value exceeds 255.
Example:
IPv4 Pfx Length First IPv4 host
98.161.92.0 /28 0
98.161.92.16. /28. 16 --------- in this case, IPv4 Host slider shows "0" and moving to "1" increments "CE IP" to 17.
Initial slider value logic needs to account for smaller IPv4 CIDRs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: