Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Google Plus Details #2

Open
marcthiele opened this issue Feb 9, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

Google Plus Details #2

marcthiele opened this issue Feb 9, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@marcthiele
Copy link

Hey Sebastiaan,

Not sure if this is an issue of the plugin or the way Bridgy handless the information or even Google+ itself, but some information is not displayed correctly. Icons and date are wrong, as you can see in my post here:
https://marcthiele.com/notes/playing-with-tuna

Screenshot:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/duvkv0flc64on5p/Screenshot%202017-02-09%2011.58.40.png?dl=0

Cheers,

/marc

@sebsel
Copy link
Owner

sebsel commented Feb 9, 2017

Hm, I don't have Google+ myself and I can't seem to find the post using this guide to Brid.gy's source urls:
https://brid.gy/about#source-urls

If you go to the folder of your post, there is a .webmentions folder, with .json files. One of them (I assume the first, starting with 0-, for januari 1970) contains that particular mention. It would be nice to know the contents of the page behind the "source":"https:\/\/brid-gy.appspot.com\/(...)".

If that page has no dt-published, it's a problem with Brid.gy or Google+.

But yeah, the template should check for 0 before parsing/showing a date.
The original plugin used the date the mention came in if dt-published was empty, but then every re-mention would be saved as well. So another option would be to add a received field in the mentions, and show that if dt-published is empty.
I also probably should dedupe on u-uid, not on dt-published + source. But that's a different issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants