Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Numbers only too #62

Closed
whitefang1997 opened this issue Feb 19, 2019 · 4 comments
Closed

Numbers only too #62

whitefang1997 opened this issue Feb 19, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@whitefang1997
Copy link

Hi Scott,I want to make it numbers based too.How would this affect the code and the size of the wheel hosting the cards and the entire mechanism?At splitflap-0.5.

Best wishes,
Fang

@scottbez1
Copy link
Owner

Hi Fang,

Have you looked at #16 ? That issue is pretty old, and the design discussion there is somewhat outdated (there are no longer any gears), but the main issue is still relevant: spool size (and size relative to the struts that hold the spool together). The spool gets really small with just 10 flaps versus the standard 40 flaps of the alphanumeric design, violating a number of assumptions in the parametric design which results in an invalid model.

Given the fundamental issues with really small spools, I suspect your best bet would be to repeat the numbers 3 or 4 times, so the spool is either 30 or 40 flaps. I haven't looked closely at a 30 flap design though, so you'd want to make sure to carefully review the design for any potential issues.

@DrSkunk
Copy link

DrSkunk commented Mar 11, 2019

My solution would probably be to set the amount of flaps to 22 and remove the odd hole, so that the resulting amount will still be 11 (10 digits + blank). In the firmware I still would have to change the amount the motor moves.
Screenshot 2019-03-11 at 13 00 15

@dwightmulcahy
Copy link

interested in a number only version too...

@DrSkunk DrSkunk mentioned this issue Jul 4, 2019
@scottbez1
Copy link
Owner

Closing this in favor of #16 to track a numbers-only variant.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants