You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This paper describes a python package that can create symbolic models residing between the low-level machine/programming language and high-level abstract solution to a problem. The symbolic model, if I understand correctly, seems to have the same role as the Java bytecode, aiming at abstracting a problem solution from a machine/code specific context into a mathematical model such that it is understandable in different computational environments. I am not sure if I am the best person to review this paper since the idea is very abstract. If the goal of this symbolic model is to make the domain expert and programmer to communicate and understand each other, I don't think current work fullfills it since the model is really hard for a non-mathematician to understand. I would still suggest it to get accepted though, since the paper describes some real work and it deserves to be delivered to a broader audience.
Some of my specific comments:
figures can not be displayed correctly in the rst file
typo in conclusion section "undertainty" --> "uncertainty"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This paper describes a python package that can create symbolic models residing between the low-level machine/programming language and high-level abstract solution to a problem. The symbolic model, if I understand correctly, seems to have the same role as the Java bytecode, aiming at abstracting a problem solution from a machine/code specific context into a mathematical model such that it is understandable in different computational environments. I am not sure if I am the best person to review this paper since the idea is very abstract. If the goal of this symbolic model is to make the domain expert and programmer to communicate and understand each other, I don't think current work fullfills it since the model is really hard for a non-mathematician to understand. I would still suggest it to get accepted though, since the paper describes some real work and it deserves to be delivered to a broader audience.
Some of my specific comments:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: