Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 17, 2022. It is now read-only.

Option to choose status bucket #1

Open
Joacchim opened this issue Feb 7, 2011 · 0 comments
Open

Option to choose status bucket #1

Joacchim opened this issue Feb 7, 2011 · 0 comments

Comments

@Joacchim
Copy link
Contributor

Joacchim commented Feb 7, 2011

An option allowing to give the name of the status bucket to be used would prevent problems caused by the bucket names limitations (255 chars, ...).

Joacchim added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 25, 2015
 - The config file format is now JSON instead of ini
 - The use can now specify a configuration for the status backend/bucket
 (Still unused in the backend)

Addresses and goes further than issue #1
WIP for issue #24
Joacchim added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 25, 2015
 - Either through CLI options or Config File, default is now enforced
 - The behavior is to use the directory ~/.cloudmig as the status storage.

Related to issue #1
Joacchim added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 16, 2015
- Provide status bucket name through an option (allows use of existing buckets
for status storage)
- Provide the location constraint (Fixes status store creation when using S3
backend)

Addresses issue #1
Joacchim added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 10, 2015
 - The config file format is now JSON instead of ini
 - The use can now specify a configuration for the status backend/bucket
 (Still unused in the backend)

Addresses and goes further than issue #1
WIP for issue #24
Joacchim added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 10, 2015
 - Either through CLI options or Config File, default is now enforced
 - The behavior is to use the directory ~/.cloudmig as the status storage.

Related to issue #1
Joacchim added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 10, 2015
- Provide status bucket name through an option (allows use of existing buckets
for status storage)
- Provide the location constraint (Fixes status store creation when using S3
backend)

Addresses issue #1
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant