You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It seems that ndarray-rand could be an independent crate in its own separate repo, like ndarray-linalg or ndarray-stats. In that way, people could focus on the specific crates and could use ndarray-rand independently.
Is there any specific/particular reason why ndarray-rand is not in its own repo? Currently, it's specified as a member here, so I suppose you would like to use the same dependencies in ndarray-rand as in ndarray, but I don't see why this constraint couldn't be kept if we move ndarray-rand to a separate repo, but I am not very familiar yet with neither ndarray nor ndarray-rand.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It seems that
ndarray-rand
could be an independent crate in its own separate repo, likendarray-linalg
orndarray-stats
. In that way, people could focus on the specific crates and could usendarray-rand
independently.Is there any specific/particular reason why
ndarray-rand
is not in its own repo? Currently, it's specified as a member here, so I suppose you would like to use the same dependencies inndarray-rand
as inndarray
, but I don't see why this constraint couldn't be kept if we movendarray-rand
to a separate repo, but I am not very familiar yet with neitherndarray
norndarray-rand
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: