You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think for greater categorisation, the unstable book should be divided into sections.
A proposal:
Compiler internal lang features ("not intended for general use")
Permanently unstable features that are not compiler internal (like the llvm intrinsics)
Novel lang features (with intent to stabilize them some day)
Library features
??
Some sections should have a higher standard of documentation, like the novel lang features, others like the library features already have documentation in rustdoc (see #41288), so their documentation should be limited to a link to the tracking issue (and maybe their rustdoc), and the "not intended for general use" features can get a lower priority to be documented as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Oh so you made PR #41295 ... only discovered it now. It has rougher categories than what was suggested by me, but I think its a good compromise. Thanks! Closing.
I think for greater categorisation, the unstable book should be divided into sections.
A proposal:
Some sections should have a higher standard of documentation, like the novel lang features, others like the library features already have documentation in rustdoc (see #41288), so their documentation should be limited to a link to the tracking issue (and maybe their rustdoc), and the "not intended for general use" features can get a lower priority to be documented as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: