Skip to content

Policy: Past behavior #2024

@ehuss

Description

@ehuss

I'd like the authoring guide to have guidance on whether or not to include information about past versions of Rust. If we do allow it, what is the guidance for how to do that?

I would prefer to generally avoid references to older versions, but I acknowledge that there are some rare cases where it is truly helpful. Is there some nuance or balance for that?

rust-lang/spec#34 (comment) mentions that rfc3355 says:

The specification is specific to the latest version of Rust. [...]

While the specification might include notes about the Rust version that a feature was introduced in for informative purposes (similar to standard library documentation), it does not attempt to accurately specify older, unsupported versions of Rust.

The Vision blog post says:

The descriptive definitions tell the reader how a construct will behave with
respect to a specific Rust version (e.g. Rust 1.76).

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Authoring guideIssues for the authoring guide and style guidelinesMetaNon-content issues (procedure, tooling, website, etc.)

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions