New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

implement == method #136

Open

masa16 opened this issue Jul 11, 2019 · 0 comments

Member

masa16 commented Jul 11, 2019 •

edited

Loading

Currently a == b is implemented as (a.eq b).count_false == 0, but this is not efficient.

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment