Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Who is using WAL? #13

Open
roseduan opened this issue Jul 10, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Who is using WAL? #13

roseduan opened this issue Jul 10, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@roseduan
Copy link
Contributor

Calling all WAL(Write Ahead Log) users!

Share a brief description of your project/use case, how WAL benefits you, and any encountered challenges.

Your insights will strengthen our community and inspire others.

Comment below with:

  • project overview
  • what scenario do you use WAL?
  • what new feature do you expect for WAL?
@roseduan roseduan pinned this issue Jul 10, 2023
@roseduan
Copy link
Contributor Author

roseduan commented Aug 1, 2023

rosedb and lotusdb are using wal as file storage backend.🎉🎉

@amityahav
Copy link
Contributor

I started using this wal for my personal vector database project. So far no complaints. Thanks!

@rosedblabs rosedblabs deleted a comment from zhonghongfly Apr 2, 2024
@hitesh22rana
Copy link

Hi @roseduan, 🙇🏼

Thank you for creating and maintaining this amazing package! 🎉

I'm currently building a message queue broker and utilizing this WAL for ensuring consistency. Here's the link to my project: mq

So far, the experience has been great—no complaints at all! That said, I have a feature request:

Would it be possible to introduce a way to asynchronously sync data to disk at configurable intervals?

If this feature isn’t currently supported, I believe it could be a valuable addition. I’d love to contribute by working on its implementation if it’s feasible. Please let me know your thoughts!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants