Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backport #368 for Crystal #386

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 8, 2019
Merged

Backport #368 for Crystal #386

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 8, 2019

Conversation

nuclearsandwich
Copy link
Member

This backports the test change in #368 that pairs with ros2/rmw_opensplice#260

@nuclearsandwich nuclearsandwich added the in review Waiting for review (Kanban column) label Feb 7, 2019
@nuclearsandwich nuclearsandwich self-assigned this Feb 7, 2019
@nuclearsandwich
Copy link
Member Author

nuclearsandwich commented Feb 8, 2019

Crystal overlay CI build: Build Status forgot this won't work as-is since I need to build it and ros2/rmw_opensplice#260 together.

@chapulina
Copy link

Also needs ros2/rcutils#131

And I'm sure you've noticed the missing DCO check 😉

Signed-off-by: Miaofei <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steven! Ragnarök <[email protected]>
@nuclearsandwich
Copy link
Member Author

And I'm sure you've noticed the missing DCO check

Yeah, although that looks like it was a discrepancy in the original commit between the sign-off name and the committer info. I've signed off on the backport myself but the bot is still not happy and with that. I think we're going to proceed without the DCO on this change since we clearly didn't have one on the PR it is backporting.

@nuclearsandwich nuclearsandwich merged commit 82bc18b into crystal Feb 8, 2019
@nuclearsandwich nuclearsandwich removed the in review Waiting for review (Kanban column) label Feb 8, 2019
@nuclearsandwich nuclearsandwich deleted the backport-368 branch February 8, 2019 18:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants