You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This gist for a ros node publisher alludes that, "pointgrey_camera_driver (at least the version installed with apt-get) doesn't properly handle camera info in indigo."
Downloading the whole stack (from https://github.com/ros-drivers/pointgrey_camera_driver.git) and compiling also does not properly handle camera info. The gist provides a workaround for publishing camera info, but not synchronously with the images. This may work for some people, but it does not work for the stereo_image_proc, which requires both images and info to be synchronized for both cameras.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I created a workaround for using stereo_proc node with regard to this camera_info issue. The following gist is a ros node that reads a yaml file for the calibration info, and remaps the stereo images as they arrive attaching image timestamp to the camera_info topic. Images and Info is published for both left and right cameras. workaround gist
There is a sample launch snippet to launch the node.
This gist for a ros node publisher alludes that, "pointgrey_camera_driver (at least the version installed with apt-get) doesn't properly handle camera info in indigo."
Downloading the whole stack (from https://github.com/ros-drivers/pointgrey_camera_driver.git) and compiling also does not properly handle camera info. The gist provides a workaround for publishing camera info, but not synchronously with the images. This may work for some people, but it does not work for the stereo_image_proc, which requires both images and info to be synchronized for both cameras.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: