You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am having issues with image quality using the ROS driver. When I take video outdoors the image is very dim. I used to work with PolySync before and never had this issue with the camera. After investigating, I found that with ROS, the camera is only adjusting the exposure and there is no control over saturation, sharpness and hue. While with polysync the camera is adjusting these parameters and the image quality is great.
I added the sharpness controls to PointGrey.cfg file to add sharpness (and autosharpness) to rqt_reconfigure. I also added it to the source code as shown below, but it seems that flycapture is not responding to these parameters change even if I do it from rqt_reconfigure.
1- Changes to Pointgrey.cfg
gen.add("auto_sharpness", bool_t, SensorLevels.RECONFIGURE_RUNNING, "Allow the camera to automatically change sharpness.", True)
2- Changes to PointGreyCamera.cpp
retVal &= PointGreyCamera::setProperty(SHARPNESS, config.auto_sharpness, config.sharpness);
Has anyone faced this issue,or am I missing something here,please advise.
Thanks for your time....
The first image for polysync, the second one for ros. I know the version of flycapture is different in the two images, I tested with both versions. I upgraded the software hoping that the issue will be resolves but it did not fix it.
Camera model: Blackfly BFLY-PGE-20E4C
OS:Ubuntu 14.04LTS
Flycatpure version: 2.9.3.43
Here are some examples Polysync Images in snowstorm (no bright light)
and these are examples from ros in cloudy weather (also no bright light) and in the same location:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I figured out what the problem was. Apparently the driver does not support RGB formatting and 24 bits encoding. I added this feature and it fixed my problem!!
Hello,
I am having issues with image quality using the ROS driver. When I take video outdoors the image is very dim. I used to work with PolySync before and never had this issue with the camera. After investigating, I found that with ROS, the camera is only adjusting the exposure and there is no control over saturation, sharpness and hue. While with polysync the camera is adjusting these parameters and the image quality is great.
I added the sharpness controls to PointGrey.cfg file to add sharpness (and autosharpness) to rqt_reconfigure. I also added it to the source code as shown below, but it seems that flycapture is not responding to these parameters change even if I do it from rqt_reconfigure.
1- Changes to Pointgrey.cfg
gen.add("auto_sharpness", bool_t, SensorLevels.RECONFIGURE_RUNNING, "Allow the camera to automatically change sharpness.", True)
gen.add("sharpness", double_t, SensorLevels.RECONFIGURE_RUNNING, "sharpness.", 1024.0, 0.0, 4095.0)
2- Changes to PointGreyCamera.cpp
retVal &= PointGreyCamera::setProperty(SHARPNESS, config.auto_sharpness, config.sharpness);
Has anyone faced this issue,or am I missing something here,please advise.
Thanks for your time....
The first image for polysync, the second one for ros. I know the version of flycapture is different in the two images, I tested with both versions. I upgraded the software hoping that the issue will be resolves but it did not fix it.
Camera model: Blackfly BFLY-PGE-20E4C
OS:Ubuntu 14.04LTS
Flycatpure version: 2.9.3.43
Here are some examples Polysync Images in snowstorm (no bright light)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27fa2/27fa26c391a6fce3cb61587177778cd517f303bf" alt="unspecified"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a33f/6a33f95ccaad74424094a82eeddf4784c23a64e2" alt="unspecified1"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/711dd/711dd4d5c58430631c32e1120974460b127c8c4f" alt="unspecified3"
and these are examples from ros in cloudy weather (also no bright light) and in the same location:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d42f/8d42fe4e8cd464415268ccc7781c26855daa87f7" alt="frame0000"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e43dd/e43dd75ad235e7397146fe1dfb3d8660af533f94" alt="frame0001"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc6ea/dc6ea0d3221acef9b4ef1db3e8d0a26390b6a4d5" alt="frame0002"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: