-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 59
remove obsolete section about code formatting, explain clang-format better #1136
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
silverweed
wants to merge
2
commits into
root-project:main
Choose a base branch
from
silverweed:coding_style
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider keeping those 2 non-tool specific paragraphs.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The first may still be useful indeed, but the second is completely handled by the formatter, no? (meaning that if we enforce the use of clang-format the user doesn't really have a choice on tab vs spaces)
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
True but clang-format is not yet (there is hope though) fully supporting the 'real' formatting we want (see in particular the alignment in the header files), consequently we still need to leave the clang-formatting optional and thus some unwanted formatting will still be committed. Most formatting are harmeless-ish and can be most hand done ... the tab vs space is extremely (slight exaggeration) annoying (to me) and can be invisible to (newer) developers, so I would keep it.
On a different note, there is a slight question on whether it is helpful to describe the general/main formatting choices so developers get used to typing it almost correct ... or not. (but we definitively can not expect developers to read the clang-format to know the rules (the .clang-format is too dense and long) ... on the other hand the existing might be a (close enough?) documentation/example)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree that it is good to give developers an overview of the main formatting choices and their rationale; on the other hand the use of an automated formatter should have the main goal of relieving them from having to spend time thinking about it. What about keeping the paragraphs but placing them below the clang format description? And make it clear that if all they care about is submitting "valid" code they can skip them but if they want more details they can optionally read them...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, reordering in this way sounds fine.