motoman/377d7be: is this LIVENESS?

[gavanderhoorn]

motoman/377d7be currently has a SOFTWARE:LIVENESS failure label.

Description:

robust/motoman/377d7be/377d7be.bug

Lines 5 to 18 in 7e3932c

	description: >
	The Motoman controller has to be prepared for use with ROS.
	For this, you have to first install MotoROS on the controller
	and afterwards a special INFORM program (INFORM is the OEM
	specific programming language). The motoman driver
	depends on a required handshake between the native INFORM robot
	code and the MotoROS component (also running on the Motoman controller).
	The MotoROS code will automatically run an INFORM job called INIT_ROS
	at the start of a motion session, which will provide the required
	handshaking. When installing the INFORM job on a DX200, it shows an
	error: "L:****) ERROR 3200 : NOP or END instruction not found (J:INIT_ROS".
	This is due to Linux line-endings in the files downloaded from Github:
	the controller expects Windows line-endings. This breaks the INFORM
	parser in the Motoman controller.

I would agree with that failure-code if the system ever reached a state in which it could be started, but the problem reported in the issue occurs during installation. It's impossible to load a specific part of the driver software onto the Yaskawa controller, which makes it impossible to ever start the driver.

Should this be some variant of BDO instead?

[gavanderhoorn]

Related: #416.

[hsd-dev]

If the system never was initialized properly, it would be SOFTWARE:NONE and SYSTEM:NONE I suppose.

[ChrisTimperley]

SOFTWARE:BDO and SYSTEM:NONE seem appropriate to me

[hsd-dev]

Currently there is only SOFTWARE:BUILD. Do we need to extend that to SOFTWARE:BDO? Though the description for BUILD is

Failures that prevent the successful completion of the build or **installation** process, such as compilation and linking errors.

[gavanderhoorn]

It's similar to some other bugs: the system never "got control", so there doesn't appear to be any opportunity to lose it.

It's a BDO indeed (deployment in this case).

Based on the description, SOFTWARE:BUILD seems appropriate then.

[gavanderhoorn]

Corrected in 153b315.