-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
rmrk-market: should unlisting stale listings be (1) open and (2) incentived? #82
Comments
That could be beneficial to reduce storage. I was thinking about how to utilize Example of auto increment Era: Tests I wrote for it: |
One challenge here is that the Proposed storage would be...
Thoughts on this? |
I believe we want to reduce the amount of reads and writes to storage and managing this for 3 separate storage could get complicated to manage. This would also create an increase in storage size. Could we potentially handle this expiration list off-chain in the frontend then have a marketplace admin account periodically call a privileged purging function to remove expired listings from |
in the case where a listing is expired, anyone should be able to unlist it. we want to maintain clean storage in general, correct?
furthermore, should we even incentivize cleaning up this stale storage like with a deposit for a listing that gets refunded on purchase?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: