You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The information would be better structured with two subfield, namely $n for the work number, and $p for the part or movement of the work.
This is an internal field and changing it would have no impact on the interoperability of the data. The display can be kept the same, but it would make links with works much better structured.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, references to single movements of a work in the 690 are to be added with a
/x
in 690$n. The guidelines readSee for example
KV 425/3
in https://muscat.rism.info/admin/sources/450201735The information would be better structured with two subfield, namely $n for the work number, and $p for the part or movement of the work.
This is an internal field and changing it would have no impact on the interoperability of the data. The display can be kept the same, but it would make links with works much better structured.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: