[Discussion] Any issue with using SBO as dependency in other operator

[wtrocki]

Context:
redhat-developer/app-services-operator#290

Would adding ServiceBindingOperator as olm dependency case any issues for your team.

[slemeur]

Not at all if we have proper integration tests and e2e tests.
What do you envision necessary for that? and how would we coordinate the effort?

cc @pmacik

[wtrocki]

No need for actions from sbo side. The only issue I could see are sandbox releases. we need to make sure we would not duplicate sbo in this scenario.
our team will check that. CC @secondsun

[pedjak]

No need for actions from sbo side. The only issue I could see are sandbox releases. we need to make sure we would not duplicate sbo in this scenario.

Right. Actually if an operator strongly depends on an API delivered by some other operator, then this should be declared in operator bundle, similar to how we do this in rpm/deb world.

[wtrocki]

Yes!