You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
To display grouped syllables in palaeography report separately according the vowel sign/phonetic transcription. If possible the syllables with anusvara and visarga should be groupped separately for medieval Sanskrit sources, and not under the root syllables. I.e. "kaṃ" and "kaḥ" should go to separate column in the paleography table, and not under "ka".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 11:06 AM Olga ***@***.***> wrote:
To display grouped syllables in palaeography report separately according
the vowel sign/phonetic transcription. If possible the syllables with
anusvara and visarga should be groupped separately for medieval Sanskrit
sources, and not under the root syllables. I.e. "kaṃ" and "kaḥ" should go
to separate column in the paleography table, and not under "ka".
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#6>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AARYOIPSRI2GNX2E5LNRJ3DTD4URLANCNFSM4ZIHJ2IQ>
.
This requires a large 'grouping' code in the sort. There has been discussion to move to a 5 digit by 1 digit secondary weight. Once this work is complete, grouping for paleography will likely have up to 999 groups (using the first 3 digits of the sort weight).
To display grouped syllables in palaeography report separately according the vowel sign/phonetic transcription. If possible the syllables with anusvara and visarga should be groupped separately for medieval Sanskrit sources, and not under the root syllables. I.e. "kaṃ" and "kaḥ" should go to separate column in the paleography table, and not under "ka".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: