Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Additional options besides Nice, Normal etc. #22

Open
RayZopf opened this issue Feb 26, 2016 · 0 comments
Open

Feature Request: Additional options besides Nice, Normal etc. #22

RayZopf opened this issue Feb 26, 2016 · 0 comments
Labels

Comments

@RayZopf
Copy link

RayZopf commented Feb 26, 2016

https://code.google.com/archive/p/lslforge/issues/16

Posted on Mar 12, 2012 by Happy Lion
I'd like to test the end-result, e.g. a function call that includes a llWhisper() or llMessageLinked() to another script somewhere else. Under some conditions, I want to make sure those llWhisper() or llMessageLinked() calls are not made.

Currently, to test that, I have to do Normal or Exhaustive. This means keying in every single call along the way leading up to this and every one proceeding after this.

We need a nice-plus: (1) Nice, but we can flag selected calls as must be there. (2) In addition, we can flag selected calls that must not be there (perhaps include wildcats for parameters)

This would speed up Unit Testing entry without sacrificing meaningfulness.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants