Replies: 2 comments
-
@m-mohr The aim is not to compete with STAC but to integrate the STAC properties applying the OGC API - Records Local Resource Catalogs concept on "scene" resources within a specific collection ( It is also to be able to provide access to the data at both an overall "collection" level comprised of multiple scenes (e.g., It also allows the use of record properties as queryables directly as part of a coverage request for the overall collection, so that a client does not need to first query scene metadata, then perform request on individual scenes -- it can do it all directly as part of a GET request on the overall The other aspect of the scene API is for being able to create / update / delete scenes that automatically updates the overall coverage (as per the Images API from OGC Testbed 15). It would also be possible to include a link from the same collection providing a |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'm not sure if this helps resolve this particular issue or not but I should point out that the Local Resources Catalogue conformance class can be applied to any OGC API endpoint where catalogue-like queries make sense. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
OGC seems to be creating a somewhat similar specification to STAC, the Scenes API.
I think we should check and discuss this, and if required, try to push them towards STAC. I'm not sure why they don't just use STAC?!
See: opengeospatial/ogcapi-coverages#171 and https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogcapi-coverages/files/12491708/19-087.pdf, chapter 13.
Has anyone thoughts or more details?
cc @cholmes
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions